Preview build. The flagship report and its exhibits are final; insights, other reports and their exhibits remain placeholders pending editorial review.

Measurement · 1 min read

Read OEE like a finance partner

Overall equipment effectiveness is a useful ratio. It is not a price, and it should not be ranked as one.

Placeholder
Isometric illustration of a production line beside a grid of hour cells, sunken grey cells for losses and one raised blue block.

Placeholder. This article is placeholder copy written to test layout and tone. It is not published research and makes no factual claims.

OEE, overall equipment effectiveness, multiplies availability, performance and quality into one ratio. This piece explains what the ratio can and cannot tell a finance partner, and what to ask for instead.

One OEE score can hide three different losses

Two lines with the same score can lose time in very different ways. The categories behind the score matter more than the score itself.

Exhibit 1

In this illustrative line, availability losses outweigh performance and quality losses combined

Illustrative data

OEE losses by category, one line, one year, percentage points of planned time

Show data table
In this illustrative line, availability losses outweigh performance and quality losses combined (OEE losses by category, one line, one year, percentage points of planned time)
CategoryValue
Availability18 pp
Performance (speed)9 pp
Quality4 pp
Link to this exhibit

Note: Values are placeholders chosen to demonstrate the exhibit format. OEE is overall equipment effectiveness; performance loss is time lost to running below rated speed.

Source: Illustrative data; placeholder pending research

Convert OEE points into hours

A percentage point of OEE means different hours on different lines. Converting each category into hours of planned time makes the losses comparable and ready to price.

On the illustrative line, one OEE point is worth $72,000

On the flagship report’s illustrative line, one point of OEE is 60 hours of planned time, 60,000 units, or $72,000 of contribution a year (Illustrative). That conversion turns a percentage that nobody funds into a sum that can sit beside a capital request.

Exhibit 2 · The capacity you already own

In this illustrative line, the four losses cost $1.65 million a year

Illustrative data

Annual cost of losses, one constraint line, thousands of dollars of contribution, plus variable cost of scrapped units

$0k$100k$200k$300k$400k$500k$600k$700kChangeovers$600kSlow running$499kUnplanned stops$360kScrap$191kincl. $77k variable cost of scrapTotal $1.65 million a year
Show data table
In this illustrative line, the four losses cost $1.65 million a year (Annual cost of losses, one constraint line, thousands of dollars of contribution, plus variable cost of scrapped units)
ItemValueUnitCite
Changeovers, contribution600.0USD thousand per yearIllustrative
Slow running, contribution499.2USD thousand per yearIllustrative
Unplanned stops, contribution360.0USD thousand per yearIllustrative
Scrap, contribution114.8USD thousand per yearIllustrative
Scrap, variable cost of scrapped units76.5USD thousand per yearIllustrative
Total1650.6USD thousand per yearIllustrative
Link to this exhibit

Note: Prices apply only on a constraint line with demand above output. A scrapped unit forfeits the contribution of its line time and its variable cost. Not a description of any real plant.

Source: Illustrative data. Trapped Capacity illustrative line model: price $2.00 and variable cost $0.80 a unit ($1.20 contribution), 1,000 units an hour ($1,200 a constraint hour).

From: The capacity you already own, Exhibit 11

Flagship report

The capacity you already own

Why the next line should be found before it is funded, and how to price the one already standing.

Download the report